Make Them Curious Reach out
WorkWhat I DoBeliefsFAQIdeasAboutReach out
Definition

What is curiosity marketing?

The definition, the mechanism underneath it, and the four measures that show whether it is working.

Curiosity marketing earns attention by opening a gap between what someone knows and what they want to know, then giving them a reason to close it themselves. It replaces the push of interruption with the pull of an unanswered question.

The mechanism is older than the label. Psychologist George Loewenstein described it in his 1994 review of curiosity research as the information gap: a form of deprivation that arrives the moment attention lands on a specific piece of knowledge a person knows they are missing. Awareness of the gap is what creates the want.

That detail matters more than it looks. A gap so wide it feels unbridgeable produces indifference. A gap already closed produces boredom. The pull happens in the narrow band where somebody knows enough to realise what they are missing.

How curiosity marketing differs from interruption marketing

Both aim at attention. They arrive at it from opposite directions.

Interruption
Curiosity
Buys a moment of the audience's time
Earns a return visit
States the conclusion up front
Opens a question worth following
Performance decays when spend stops
Compounds as the body of work grows
Measured in impressions and reach
Measured in branded search and direct visits
Fails in silence, by being ignored
Fails loudly, by being disagreed with

Why it works better in B2B than in consumer marketing

Consumer purchases can happen on impulse in the same second attention lands. Business purchases run for months and involve a committee. 6sense put the average B2B buying cycle at 10.1 months in 2025, with 5.1 vendors evaluated.

Across a window that long, the mechanism that regenerates attention beats the one that buys it. A brand somebody keeps checking back on stays present through a ten-month evaluation. A brand that bought a moment in month one has to buy month two as well.

How to open a gap someone wants to close

Specificity where the category is vague

A category full of adjectives makes a number feel like a revelation. Publish the figure, the timeline, the price, the failure rate. Precision reads as confidence and it opens the obvious follow-up question: how.

A position with an edge

A claim that could carry any competitor's logo leaves a buyer where it found them. A claim somebody could argue with tells them where you stand, and gives them a reason to see whether you can defend it.

Proof before the pitch

Showing the working earns the right to the conclusion. A method laid out in public invites the question of whether it would work here, which is the question that starts a sales conversation.

Deliberate incompleteness

An honest gap holds attention. The distinction that separates this from a clickbait headline is delivery: the question raised has to be answered somewhere reachable, in full, at the standard the question implied.

Where curiosity marketing goes wrong

Three failure modes account for most of it.

  • Intrigue with an empty room behind it. The headline earns the click and the substance underneath falls short. This trains an audience to skip the next one, which costs more than the click was worth.
  • Mystery for its own sake. Vagueness marketed as intrigue. A gap only pulls when somebody can see the shape of what is missing.
  • Curiosity aimed at the wrong people. Attention from an audience outside the market looks identical to progress in a dashboard, and returns nothing.
The third one, from experience

One of my campaigns offered free platform credits to startup founders. It performed beautifully: $16 per click, 19.6% of clickers converted, $80 per lead. Against enterprise campaigns costing $1,445 per lead, it looked like the best thing in the account by a distance.

Those founders sat outside the enterprise buying pool entirely. The offer was easy to say yes to, which is why it converted, and the yes meant very little. A dashboard reads curiosity that leads somewhere and curiosity that is merely cheap as the same event.

How to measure it

Curiosity leaves a specific trace: people go looking. Four measures capture it, and all four are available without new tooling.

  • Branded search volume. The cleanest signal there is. Somebody typing the name chose to.
  • Direct traffic. Arrivals with no referrer, from people who remembered.
  • Returning visitor share. Whether the first visit earned a second.
  • Inbound enquiries mentioning a specific piece. The point where curiosity turns into revenue, and the only one finance cares about.

Reach and impressions describe distribution. These four describe pull.

Where this becomes work

Campaigns and content is curiosity marketing with a budget, a deadline and somebody accountable for the result.

Keep reading: The Make Them Curious manifesto and Content marketing wins the deal before the first call.

Questions people ask

What is curiosity marketing?

Curiosity marketing earns attention by opening a gap between what someone knows and what they want to know, then giving them a reason to close it themselves. It replaces the push of interruption with the pull of an unanswered question.

How is curiosity marketing different from clickbait?

Both open a gap. Clickbait leaves it open or fills it with less than the headline promised. Curiosity marketing answers the question in full, at the standard the question implied, which is what earns the second visit.

Does curiosity marketing work in B2B?

It suits B2B better than consumer marketing. The average B2B buying cycle ran 10.1 months in 2025 with 5.1 vendors evaluated, so a mechanism that regenerates attention across months outperforms one that buys a single moment.

How do you measure curiosity marketing?

Through four signals that show people went looking: branded search volume, direct traffic, returning visitor share, and inbound enquiries that mention a specific piece of work.

What is the curiosity gap?

The curiosity gap is the space between what a person knows and what they realise they could know. George Loewenstein described it in 1994 as an information gap: attention lands on something you know you are missing, and the feeling behaves like deprivation until you close it. Awareness of the gap is what creates the desire to close it.

Think this way too?

Then we are probably alike. Tell me what you are working on.